Modeling User Arguments, Interactions, and Attributes for Stance Prediction in Online Debate Forums

نویسندگان

  • Minghui Qiu
  • Yanchuan Sim
  • Noah A. Smith
  • Jing Jiang
چکیده

Online debate forums are important social media for people to voice their opinions and debate with each other. Mining user stances or viewpoints from these forums has been a popular research topic. However, most current work does not address an important problem: for a specific issue, there may not be many users participating and expressing their opinions. Despite the sparsity of user stances, users may provide rich side information; for example, users may write arguments to back up their stances, interact with each other, and provide biographical information. In this work, we propose an integrated model to leverage side information. Our proposed method is a regression-based latent factor model which jointly models user arguments, interactions, and attributes. Our method can perform stance prediction for both warm-start and cold-start users. We demonstrate in experiments that our method has promising results on both micro-level and macro-level stance prediction.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Modeling User Arguments, Interactions, and Attributes for Stance Prediction in Online Debate Forums Supplementary Document

We propose an integrated model to jointly model user arguments, interactions and attributes for the task of stance prediction. The graphical representation of the model can be found in Figure 1. The model is composed of four parts: i.) user profiling, which considers a regression-based latent factorization method to incorporate user attributes for profiling users; ii.) user stance, which contai...

متن کامل

User Stance Prediction via Online Behavior Mining

Nowadays social media, such as Twitter and all kinds of online forums, becomes a platform where people can express their opinions implicitly or explicitly. For example, in Twitter, people follow people they trust, and retweet the tweets they agree. In online forums, such as PoliticalForum.com, people explicitly express their opinions and interact with each other using text. Our goal is to under...

متن کامل

Combining Textual Entailment and Argumentation Theory for Supporting Online Debates Interactions

Blogs and forums are widely adopted by online communities to debate about various issues. However, a user that wants to cut in on a debate may experience some difficulties in extracting the current accepted positions, and can be discouraged from interacting through these applications. In our paper, we combine textual entailment with argumentation theory to automatically extract the arguments fr...

متن کامل

Joint Models of Disagreement and Stance in Online Debate

Online debate forums present a valuable opportunity for the understanding and modeling of dialogue. To understand these debates, a key challenge is inferring the stances of the participants, all of which are interrelated and dependent. While collectively modeling users’ stances has been shown to be effective (Walker et al., 2012c; Hasan and Ng, 2013), there are many modeling decisions whose ram...

متن کامل

CMPS 245, Winter 17 Project: Ideology-Backed Stance Classification

The determination of stance in two-sided discussions/debates in online debate forums is a new and interesting problem in opinion mining. We target the task of classifying stance in ideological debates on online debate forums, and this is a rather challenging problem due to the nature of debate setting and the language used. (Hasan and Ng, ) had introduced the notion of using ideology as an inte...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015